Therapy Where You Do It Over and Over Again

Authored by Joseph Mercola via LewRockwell.com,

From the commencement of the COVID-19 pandemic, the blaring call has been to test, examination and test some more. However, correct from the start, serious questions arose about the tests beingness used to diagnose this infection, and questions have only multiplied since so.

Positive contrary transcription polymerase concatenation reaction (RT-PCR) tests have been used as the justification for keeping big portions of the world locked down for the better part of 2020.

This, despite the fact that PCR tests have proven remarkably unreliable with high false outcome rates, and aren't designed to be used as a diagnostic tool in the showtime identify every bit they cannot distinguish between inactive viruses and "live" or reproductive ones.

Dr. Mike Yeadon, erstwhile vice president and scientific director of Pfizer, has fifty-fifty gone on record stating that false positive results from unreliable PCR tests are existence used to "industry a 'second wave' based on 'new cases,'" when in fact a second wave is highly unlikely.

Understanding PCR Tests

Before his death, the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, repeatedly withal unsuccessfully stressed that this test should not be used as a diagnostic tool for the uncomplicated reason that it's incapable of diagnosing illness.

A positive examination does not really mean that an active infection is present. As noted in a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and prevention publication on coronavirus and PCR testing dated July 13 2020:

• Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative amanuensis for clinical symptoms.

• The functioning of this test has non been established for monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection.

• This examination cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.

So, what does the PCR test actually tell us? The PCR swab collects RNA from your nasal crenel. This RNA is and so opposite transcribed into Dna. All the same, the genetic snippets are and then pocket-sized they must be amplified in order to become discernible. Each round of amplification is called a cycle.

Amplification over 35 cycles is considered unreliable and scientifically unjustified, nevertheless Drosten tests and tests recommended by the Globe Health Arrangement are gear up to 45 cycles.

What this does is amplify whatsoever, even insignificant sequences of viral DNA that might be present to the point that the examination reads "positive," even if the viral load is extremely low or the virus is inactive. Every bit a result of these excessive bicycle thresholds, you terminate up with a far higher number of positive tests than yous would otherwise.

We've as well had problems with faulty and contaminated tests. As soon as the genetic sequence for SARS-CoV-two became bachelor in January 2020, German researchers speedily developed a PCR exam for the virus.

In March 2020, The New York Times reported the initial test kits developed past the CDC had been establish to exist flawed. The Verge too reported that this flawed CDC exam in turn became the basis for the WHO's test, which the CDC ended up refusing to utilize.

PCR Tests Cannot Observe Infection

Maybe most importantly of all, the PCR tests cannot distinguish between inactive viruses and "live" or reproductive ones.

What that means is that PCR tests cannot detect infection. Menstruum. It cannot tell you whether you're currently ill, whether yous'll develop symptoms in the most future, or whether you're contagious.

The tests may choice up dead debris or inactive viral particles that pose no risk whatsoever to the patient and others. What'due south more, the test tin pick up the presence of other coronaviruses, and then a positive result may simply indicate that you've recuperated from a mutual cold in the past.

An "infection" is when a virus penetrates into a cell and replicates. As the virus multiplies, symptoms set up in. A person is merely infectious if the virus is actually replicating. Every bit long as the virus is inactive and non replicating, it's completely harmless both to the host and others.

Chances are, if you have no symptoms, a positive test simply means it has detected inactive viral DNA in your torso. This would also hateful that yous are not contagious and pose no take a chance to anyone.

For all of these reasons, a number of highly respected scientists around the world are now proverb that what nosotros have is not a COVID-19 pandemic merely a PCR exam pandemic. In his September 20, 2020, article5 "Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics — The Deadly Danger of False Positives," Yeadon explains why basing our pandemic response on positive PCR tests is and so problematic.

In curt, it appears millions of people are merely being found to conduct inactive viral Deoxyribonucleic acid that pose no chance to anyone, yet these test results are being used by the global technocracy to implement a make new economical and social system based on draconian surveillance and totalitarian controls.

Artificially Created Justifications for Totalitarian Controls

As reported by The Vaccine Reaction, September 29, 2020:

"The test'due south threshold is so high that it detects people with the live virus as well as those with a few genetic fragments left over from a past infection that no longer poses a chance. Information technology'southward like finding a pilus in a room later a person left information technology, says Michael Mina, Md, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds compiled past officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, upwards to xc% of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The New York Times found...

'We've been using one type of data for everything, and that is only plus or minus — that's all,' Dr. Mina said. 'We're using that for clinical diagnostics, for public health, for policy decision-making.'

But 'aye' or 'no' isn't good enough, he added. It's the corporeality of virus that should dictate the infected patient's adjacent steps. 'It'due south really irresponsible, I think, to forgo the recognition that this is a quantitative effect,' Dr. Mina said."

Again, medical experts concord whatever cycle threshold over 35 cycles makes the examination too sensitive, every bit at that point it starts picking up harmless inactive DNA fragments. Mina believes a more reasonable cutoff would exist 30 or less.

Co-ordinate to The New York Times, the CDC'south own calculations show it'southward extremely unlikely to detect live viruses in samples that have gone through more than than 33 cycles, and research published in April 2020 ended patients with positive PCR tests that had a bicycle threshold above 33 were not contagious and could safely be discharged from the infirmary or home isolation.

Importantly, when officials at the New York state laboratory, the Wadsworth Centre, reanalyzed testing data at The Times' asking, they found that changing the threshold from 40 cycles to 35 cycles eliminated about 43% of the positive results. Limiting it to xxx cycles eliminated a whopping 63%. The Vaccine Reaction adds:

"In Massachusetts, from 85 to 90% of people who tested positive in July with a cycle threshold of 40 would have been deemed negative if the threshold were xxx cycles, Dr. Mina said. 'I would say that none of those people should exist contact-traced, not one,' he said.

'I'm really shocked that it could exist that high — the proportion of people with high CT value results,' said Ashish Jha, MD, manager of the Harvard Global Wellness Institute. 'Boy, does it actually change the way we need to be thinking about testing'...

In late August, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) canonical the get-go rapid coronavirus test that doesn't need any special estimator equipment. Made past Abbot Laboratories, the 15-infinitesimal test [BinaxNOW] will sell for U.Southward. $5 only still requires a nasal swab to exist taken by a wellness worker.

The Abbot test is the fourth rapid point-of-care test that looks for the presence of antigens rather than the virus'southward genetic code as the PCR molecular tests do."

Massive Waste material of Resource

As noted past Dr. Tom Jefferson and professor Carl Henegan in an October 31, 2020, article in the Daily Mail,sixteen mass PCR testing has been a massive waste or resource, every bit it doesn't provide us with the information we actually demand to know — who's infectious, how far is the virus spreading and how fast does it spread?

Instead, it has led to economic devastation from business shutdowns and isolating noninfectious people in their homes for weeks and months on end. Jefferson and Henegan claim they shared their pandemic response plan with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson over a month ago, and merely presented it to him again. "We urge him to pay attention and embrace it," they write, adding:

"At that place are but 2 things nigh which we can be certain: beginning, that lockdowns practice not piece of work in the long term... The idea that a month of economical hardship volition permit some sort of 'reset', assuasive us a brighter time to come, is a myth. What, when it ends, do we retrieve will happen? Meanwhile, ever-increasing restrictions volition destroy lives and livelihoods.

The 2nd certainty is this: that we demand to find a style out of the mess that does no more damage than the virus itself... Our strategy would be to tackle the four key failings."

These four areas are:

1. Addressing the problems in the government'southward mass testing programme

2. Addressing "the blight of confused and contradictory statistics"

3. Protect and isolate the vulnerable — primarily the elderly, but too hospitalized patients in general and staff — while allowing the residue to maintain "some semblance of normal life"

4. Inform the public nigh the truthful and quantifiable costs of lockdown that "kill people just as surely as COVID-19"

"If we do these things, in that location is existent hope that we can learn to live with the virus. That, after all, was supposed to be the plan," Jefferson and Henegan notation. With regard to testing, the pair phone call "for a national program of testing quality command to ensure that results are authentic, precise and consistent."

Importantly, we must not rely on positive/negative readings alone. The results must be assessed in relation to other factors, such every bit the age of the subject and whether they are symptomatic, to determine who actually poses an infectious adventure. You can review the full details of their proposed plan at the finish of their Daily Mail commodity.

Lockdown Dangers Have Been Kept Out of Public Word

Jefferson and Henegan aren't the merely ones highlighting the fact that the global lockdown strategy is causing more damage and destruction than the virus itself. In a June xvi, 2020 article in The Federalist, James Lucas, a New York Urban center attorney, wrote:xviii

"If we're going to allow models and modelers to dictate the entire nature of our society, one would hope that the models are as consummate equally possible. Yet the epidemiological models that have and so transformed our earth are seriously incomplete, and therefore fundamentally inadequate.

Any medical therapy is supposed to be tested for both efficacy and  safe. There accept been several studies examining the effectiveness of the lockdowns in combating the spread of the COVID-19 virus, with mixed conclusions.

So far, still, none of these studies or models have analyzed the safe side of the lockdown therapy. In response to questions from dr. Sens. Rand Paul and Bill Cassidy, Dr. Anthony Fauci admits this side of the equation has not been accounted for in the models now driving our world.

As noted in an open letter recently signed by more than 600 wellness-care professionals, the public health costs from the lockdowns — described as a 'mass casualty incident' are existent and growing.

These models are estimations based on existing enquiry. The constantly changing projections of coronavirus deaths are extrapolations from research on previous epidemics. However modelers have no excuse for leaving evaluations of the lockdowns' massive costs to public health out of their models."

The Subconscious Costs of Lockdowns

How does the "lockdown therapy" affect public rubber? In his article, Lucas highlights the following:

Increased chronic disease rates due to unemployment, poverty and putting non-COVID medical intendance on concord — Research23 past the Veterans Administration has shown delaying cancer treatment for just i month led to a xx% increment in bloodshed. Some other study found each ane-calendar month delay in breast cancer diagnosis increased bloodshed by ten%

Increased rates of mental wellness bug due to unemployment and isolation

Increased bloodshed rates from suicide — In one study, being unemployed was associated with a twofold to threefold college relative take a chance of suicide. A more recent study estimates "deaths of despair" linked to lockdowns may be effectually 75,000 in the U.S.

Reduced commonage life span — Extended unemployment is also associated with shorter, unhealthier lives. Hannes Schwandt, a health economic science researcher at Northwestern Academy, estimates an extended economic shutdown could shorten the lifespan of 6.four million Americans entering the job market by an average of about two years. Lucas notes:

"If epidemiologists don't care to accept account of this cost, another profession must. A study28 just released by a group of South African actuaries estimates that the net reduction in lifespan from increased unemployment and poverty due to a national lockdown will exceed the increased lifespan due to lives saved from COVID-xix by the lockdown by a gene of 30 to ane.

In other words, each year of additional life attributable to isolating potential coronavirus victims in the lockdown comes at a cost of thirty years lost due to the negative public health effects of a lockdown..."

Lack of education is also associated with significantly shorter life spans and poorer health. High school driblet-outs die on average nine years sooner than college graduates, and school closings disproportionally affect poorer students.

Who Pays the Most?

As noted by Lucas, in addition to computing the overall costs on society, modelers must likewise determine "on whom those costs fall," considering the costs are non borne every bit by all. The consequences of the lockdowns disproportionally affect those who are already the near vulnerable — financially and health wise — such as those living near the poverty line, the chronically ill, people with mental illness and minorities in general.

"Contrary to the PR slogan, we are NOT all in this together," Lucas writes. "Nosotros demand less insipid pro-lockdown propaganda extolling the virtues of the 'essential' workers, and more serious analysis of the enormous public health toll the lockdowns are imposing on them. Otherwise, nosotros may come to see the era of coronavirus as just the time where pro-lockdown elites sacrificed the working class31  to protect themselves."

A Pandemic of Fearmongering

An October 28, 2020, article featured by the Ron Paul Establish points out that:

"Ever since the alleged pandemic erupted this past March the mainstream media has spewed a non-stop stream of misinformation that appears to be laser focused on generating maximum fear among the citizenry.

But the facts and the scientific discipline but don't back up the grave moving picture painted of a mortiferous virus sweeping the country. Aye, we practise have a pandemic, but information technology' a pandemic of ginned upward pseudo-science masquerading as unbiased fact."

Nine facts that can exist backed up with data "paints a very unlike picture show from the fear and dread being relentlessly drummed into the brains of unsuspecting citizens," the article states. In addition to the fact that PCR testing is practically useless, for all the reasons already mentioned, these information-backed facts include:

1. A positive test is Non a "case" — As explained past Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness33 lecture, featured in "How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible," media and public health officials announced to have purposefully conflated "cases" or positive tests with the actual illness.

Medically speaking, a "case" refers to a sick person. It never ever referred to someone who had no symptoms of illness. At present all suddenly, this well-established medical term, "instance," has been completely and arbitrarily redefined to mean someone who tested positive for the presence of viral RNA. As noted by Merritt, "That is not epidemiology. That's fraud."

ii. According to the CDC34and other research data,35 the COVID-19 survival charge per unit is over 99%, and the vast bulk of deaths occur in those over 70, which is close to normal life expectancy.

3. CDC analysis reveals 85% of patients testing positive for COVID-19 wore face masks "often" or "e'er" in the 2 weeks preceding their positive test. As noted in the Ron Paul article,36 "The only rational conclusion from this study is that cloth face masks offer footling if whatever protection from Covid-nineteen infection."

4. There are inexpensive, proven successful therapies for COVID-19 —Examples include various regimens involving hydroxychloroquine with zinc and antibiotics, quercetin-based protocols, the MATH+ protocol and nebulized hydrogen peroxide.

5. The death rate has not risen despite pandemic deaths — Data37,38 bear witness the overall all-crusade bloodshed has remained steady during 2020 and doesn't veer from the norm. In other words, COVID-19 has non killed off more of the population than would have died in any given year anyway.

As noted in the Ron Paul article, "According to the CDC as of early May 2020 the full number of deaths in the US was 944,251 from Jan ane — April 30th. This is actually slightly lower than the number of deaths during the same period in 2017 when 946,067 total deaths were reported."

15,000 Doctors and Scientists Phone call for End to Lockdowns

All in all, in that location are many reasons to suspect that connected lockdowns, social distancing and mask mandates are completely unnecessary and volition not significantly alter the grade of this pandemic affliction, or the final death count.

And, with regard to universal PCR testing where individuals are tested every two weeks or fifty-fifty more frequently, whether they accept symptoms or not, this is conspicuously a pointless effort that yields useless data. It'south just a tool to spread fear, which in turn allows for the rapid implementation of the totalitarian command mechanisms required to pull off The Slap-up Reset. Fortunately, more than and more people are now starting to see through this plot.

About 45,000 scientists and doctors worldwide have already signed the Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for the cease to all lockdowns and implementation of a herd immunity approach to the pandemic, meaning governments should allow people who are non at significant risk of serious COVID-xix illness to get dorsum to normal life, as the lockdown approach is having a devastating result on public health — far worse than the virus itself. The declaration states:

"Coming from both the left and right, and around the globe, we take devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating furnishings on short and long-term public wellness...

The virtually compassionate arroyo that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to let those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build upwardly immunity to coronavirus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest chance. We telephone call this focused protection."

The proclamation points out that electric current lockdown policies volition result in backlog mortality in the future, primarily among younger people and the working course. As of November five, 2020, The Great Barrington Announcement had been signed past 11,791 medical and public health scientists, 33,903 medical practitioners and 617,685 "concerned citizens."

rosadofancessid.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/why-covid-19-testing-tragic-waste

Share this post